This entry devotes the following fundamental question: if
is Hölder continuous, then how about
for some constant
? Throughout this entry, we work on
which is not necessarily bounded.
Firstly, we have an elementary result
Proposition. Ifand
are
-Hölder continuous and bounded, so is
.
Proof. The proof is simple, we just observe that
which yields
Consequently,
for any positive integer numberand any
-Hölder continuous and bounded function
, function
is also
-Hölder continuous and bounded.
Let us assume ,
is
-Hölder continuous and bounded,
is a constant. Let
. Since
, we may assume
is also bounded away from zero, that means there exist two constants
such that
We now study the
-Hölder continuity of
. Observe that function
is sub-additive in the sense that
Indeed, by dividing both sides by
we arrive at
Since
the above inequality comes from the Bernoulli inequality. Therefore if there are some
then
holds for any
. We now arrive at
We now make use the above estimate to show that
is
-Hölder continuous. Indeed, we have the following
Consequently, we get
Thus, from
we claim that
is
-Hölder continuous.
Let us now turn to the case
. For the sake of simplicity, let us denote
, i.e. the function under investigating is
. Obviously
Thus
is
-Hölder continuous since
for any
. Consequently,
for any positive integer numberand any
-Hölder continuous and bounded function
, function
is
-Hölder continuous.
Similarly, we can prove
Thus
is
-Hölder continuous. It is now easy to prove that
is also
-Hölder continuous. So far we have proved the following
Theorem. Ifis
-Hölder continuous, positive and bounded (i.e.
). We assume in addition
is bounded away from zero (i.e.
). Then
is also
-Hölder continuous for any constant
.
The boundedness of
plays an important role in our argument. In practice, if strictly positive function
is locally
-Hölder continuous on
, we are the able to apply the theorem. We will discuss something related to this application later.
No comments:
Post a Comment